John Aldridge recently criticized Newcastle United’s stance on Alexander Isak’s transfer, calling it “incredible” and describing the demands being made of Liverpool as Ludicrous. Speaking to the Liverpool Echo on August 19, 2025, Aldridge highlighted how Liverpool fans can relate to Newcastle supporters because of their own history with star players pushing to leave. He cited past instances such as Kevin Keegan’s exit in 1977 and more recent cases involving Luis Suarez, Javier Mascherano, and Fernando Torres, who all caused disruption to force transfers.
Aldridge implied that Newcastle’s refusal to accept Liverpool’s £110 million offer for Isak was unreasonable, framing it within the wider transfer saga. Critics have noted Aldridge’s comments as biased, given his known Liverpool allegiance, arguing that he lacks objectivity and integrity by siding with Liverpool’s interests in the debate. His commentary has been described as embarrassing by some media outlets, accusing him of pandering to Liverpool supporters rather than providing a fair analysis.
Meanwhile, other perspectives emphasize that Newcastle United have not received credible bids aside from Liverpool’s initial £110 million offer, which they found derisory. Alexander Isak himself has not submitted a formal transfer request, meaning he retains loyalty bonuses that would be forfeited if he pushed for a move. Newcastle’s strategy reportedly depends on acquiring suitable replacements before sanctioning Isak’s departure, and they have refused to sell without adequate cover.
Luke Edwards of The Telegraph clarified that Newcastle’s position remains firm: they will not sign players merely to replace Isak and are unlikely to sell unless a better offer arrives alongside incoming talent. With the Premier League transfer window closing soon on September 1, 2025, the current consensus is that Isak will remain at Newcastle this summer. This situation highlights the complex negotiations and loyalties entangled in high-profile transfers.