Below is a summary of the full article. Click here for the full version from Football Insider or go back to LFC Live.
Exclusive: Man United Turn Attention to Signing Jean-Philippe Mateta in January
Manchester United have set their sights on Crystal Palace striker Jean-Philippe Mateta as a prime target for the January transfer window, according to sources close to the club. The 28-year-old French international, who has established himself as a consistent goal-scorer in the Premier League, is reportedly at the top of United's shortlist to bolster their attacking options under manager Ruben Amorim.[1][2]
Mateta, contracted to Palace until 2027 (with some reports noting an option until 2026), has notched nine goals this season, contributing significantly to Palace's strong campaign that saw them qualify for the Europa League and win the FA Cup. His form—17 goals in the 2024/25 season—has alerted top clubs, positioning him as a potential France World Cup squad contender at the peak of his career.[1][2]
Despite Palace's desire to retain their star forward, ongoing contract talks have hit roadblocks over financial demands. Insiders reveal difficulties in reaching middle ground, with Mateta pushing for better terms amid interest from abroad. Palace are preparing an improved offer to fend off suitors, but a departure in January remains possible if no agreement is reached—especially after the club was "burnt" by Marc Guehi's impending free exit. Valuations range from £25m-£50m, though United face challenges from Profitability and Sustainability Rules.[1][3]
A January move is considered unlikely by some sources, with 2026 seen as more realistic. Serie A clubs and AC Milan are monitoring, potentially luring Mateta away from England entirely. Palace would demand at least €47m, but openness to offers could accelerate a deal if United act decisively in the coming days.[2][3][4]
United's interest underscores their need for a reliable striker, with Mateta's Premier League pedigree making him an attractive, proven option over riskier alternatives.[1]
(Word count: 298)
