Football Insider

Ex-refs chief shares instant reaction to Shea Lacey's red card vs Brighton after analysing footage

Below is a summary of the full article. Click here for the full version from Football Insider or go back to LFC Live.


Former Premier League referee Keith Hackett has delivered his verdict on Shea Lacey’s red card against Brighton, insisting the Manchester United youngster has only himself to blame after reacting angrily to the match officials. Hackett, analysing the incident for Football Insider, explained that Lacey’s dismissal came as a result of dissent towards the referee following a throw-in decision that went against United late in the FA Cup tie.



According to Hackett, the sequence began when Brighton were awarded a throw-in that Lacey clearly felt should have gone his way. The teenager protested the call, first picking up a booking for his challenge and then immediately earning a second yellow for his verbal reaction and body language towards the referee. Hackett stressed that, under current directives, officials have been told to clamp down firmly on dissent, particularly visible outbursts that undermine the referee’s authority.

Hackett acknowledged Lacey’s frustration, noting the context of United’s poor performance and the high-pressure environment, but maintained that the referee’s actions were justified within the laws of the game. He pointed out that players have been repeatedly warned that emotional responses and confrontational behaviour will be punished, regardless of age or inexperience. For Hackett, Lacey crossed a clear line by continuing his complaints after the initial decision, leaving the referee with little choice but to issue a second yellow card.

The ex-refs chief also suggested that the incident should serve as an early lesson in professional discipline for Lacey. He argued that coaches at Manchester United will likely use the red card as a teaching moment, emphasising the need to maintain composure, channel frustration more constructively, and respect officials’ decisions even when they appear harsh. While Hackett expressed some sympathy for a young player in a high-stakes match, he ultimately concluded that the dismissal was avoidable and firmly in line with modern refereeing standards on dissent.