This is Anfield

Liverpool 0-0 Leeds: Player Ratings

Below is a summary of the full article. Click here for the full version from This is Anfield or go back to LFC Live.


Liverpool 0-0 Leeds: Player Ratings

In a tightly contested Premier League clash at Anfield, Liverpool were held to a frustrating 0-0 draw by Daniel Farke's resilient Leeds United side. The Reds dominated possession but struggled to break down a stubborn defense, extending Leeds' unbeaten run while denting Liverpool's title aspirations early in 2026.[2]



Match Overview

Liverpool controlled the ball for over 65% of the game, firing off 18 shots but managing just 4 on target. Leeds, playing on the counter, frustrated the hosts with disciplined defending and timely interventions. Key moments included a disallowed Liverpool goal for offside and a late Leeds break that Alisson superbly saved. The point leaves Liverpool atop the table but vulnerable, while Leeds climb into mid-table safety.[1][2]

Liverpool Player Ratings

Player Rating Performance Notes
Alisson 7.0/10 (70%) Solid distribution; crucial late save to deny Leeds.[1]
Conor Bradley 6.4/10 (64%) Decent crossing but caught out on transitions.[1]
Ibrahima Konaté 6.9/10 (69%) Strong in duels; won 5/6 aerial battles.[1]
Virgil van Dijk 7.0/10 (70%) Captain's display; organized backline impeccably.[1]
Andy Robertson 6.2/10 (62%) Overlapped well but final ball lacking.[1]
Ryan Gravenberch 6.9/10 (69%) Broke lines effectively; 92% pass accuracy.[1]
Curtis Jones 6.8/10 (68%) Energetic midfield presence; created 2 chances.[1]

Standout Performers & Analysis

Virgil van Dijk earned Man of the Match honors for his composure, while Alisson's reflexes preserved the clean sheet. Midfield duo Gravenberch and Jones showed promise but lacked killer instinct. Arne Slot's side must sharpen their edge ahead of midweek fixtures. Leeds' Daniel Farke masterminded a tactical masterclass, frustrating Liverpool's attack and securing a valuable point.[1][2]

Full Leeds ratings and post-match quotes available in the original article. (Word count: 298)

[1][2]