Echo

Liverpool given VAR reasoning as late goal controversially ruled out vs Nottingham Forest

Below is a summary of the full article. Click here for the full version from Echo or go back to LFC Live.


Liverpool Given VAR Reasoning as Late Goal Controversially Ruled Out vs Nottingham Forest

In a dramatic Premier League clash at Anfield, Liverpool suffered a shocking 0-3 defeat to Nottingham Forest, with VAR decisions at the center of controversy. The match, refereed by Andrew Madley with VAR James Bell, highlighted inconsistencies in offside and handball rulings, drawing comparisons to Liverpool's recent disallowed goal against Manchester City.[1][2][3]



Forest struck first in the 33rd minute through defender Murillo. Dan Ndoye stood in an offside position in front of Liverpool goalkeeper Alisson Becker, prompting a VAR check. Officials deemed Ndoye not in Alisson's line of vision and not impacting play, confirming the goal. Pundits noted similarities to Virgil van Dijk's disallowed strike at the Etihad 13 days prior, where Andy Robertson was ruled to obstruct the keeper. Sky Sports' Dermot Gallagher said officials had "learnt" from that incident, while Jay Bothroyd called for consistency, stating Liverpool's City goal should have stood.[1][3]

Two minutes later, Forest thought they'd doubled their lead. Igor Jesus challenged Liverpool's Ibrahima Konaté, who played the ball onto Jesus' body. Jesus then scored, but referee Madley disallowed it for handball, believing the ball struck Jesus' arm first. VAR upheld the call, labeling it an accidental handball. Analysts debated its harshness, with one commentator suggesting it was a "lifeline" for Liverpool, as footage showed no clear arm contact.[1][2]

Arne Slot's post-match reaction was scathing, calling the officiating "embarrassing." Liverpool fans fumed over perceived double standards, especially after their Van Dijk agony. Forest capitalized, adding two more goals for a stunning win. Pundits like Gallagher highlighted the subjective nature of "impacting play," urging tighter guidelines amid ongoing VAR debates.[2][3]

The result intensifies scrutiny on Premier League VAR protocols, with Liverpool feeling doubly aggrieved in consecutive weeks.