Daily Express

Man Utd, Arsenal and Liverpool clash as Premier League clubs vote on salary cap

Below is a summary of the full article. Click here for the full version from Daily Express or go back to LFC Live.


The Premier League is at a critical juncture as clubs prepare to vote on a controversial salary cap system known as "anchoring," which would limit all 20 clubs to spending a maximum amount tied to the revenue of the lowest-finishing team in the league. The current proposal would cap spending on player wages and transfer-related costs — including agent fees — at about £600 million, based on Southampton being the bottom club in the previous season. This would fundamentally change financial regulations in the league, replacing the existing profit and sustainability rules (PSR).



The anchoring proposal has sparked a divide among Premier League clubs. Notably, the two Manchester clubs and Arsenal oppose the idea, while clubs such as Liverpool, Everton, Aston Villa, Sunderland, and Burnley are expected to support it. A majority of 14 out of 20 clubs is required to pass the changes. Given this split, there is uncertainty over whether the salary cap will be approved during the shareholder meeting.

Critics of the salary cap argue it could reduce players' wages and agency fees, with the Professional Footballers' Association threatening legal action. There is also concern about the potential "slippery slope" effect, whereby similar caps might be imposed on lower leagues with far smaller salary ceilings. Proponents believe anchoring is essential to prevent financial disparities from widening excessively and to promote greater competition by tying spending limits to the lowest-ranked club's income.

The vote is one of the most significant in Premier League history, potentially altering financial governance and competitive balance. Should the proposals fail to receive sufficient support, the league will continue under its current PSR framework. However, the Premier League acknowledges that financial sustainability remains a pressing issue that will require solutions, whether through anchoring or alternative reforms.