Below is a summary of the full article. Click here for the full version from Mirror or go back to LFC Live.
Nottingham Forest vs Liverpool: VAR Drama Defines Thrilling Anfield Clash
In a match packed with controversy at Anfield, Liverpool secured a hard-fought victory over Nottingham Forest, but VAR decisions stole the spotlight, leaving fans and managers fuming.[1][2]
The drama kicked off early when Forest's Brazilian center-back Murillo fired a low shot into the net after Liverpool failed to clear a corner. Liverpool players erupted in protests, claiming Forest's Dan Ndoye, who was offside, blocked goalkeeper Alisson's line of sight. Despite the appeals, VAR reviewed and upheld the goal. The official Premier League Match Centre tweeted: "The goal was reviewed and upheld by VAR, concluding that Ndoye was not obstructing Alisson's vision and did not act in a way that affected an opponent."[1] This call drew comparisons to Liverpool's recent 3-0 loss to Manchester City, where Virgil van Dijk's goal was disallowed for similar interference by Andy Robertson.
Minutes later, VAR intervened again. As Forest pressed, Ibrahim Konate's clearance struck Igor Jesus, who pounced to slot the ball past Alisson. The referee initially ruled it out for handball, and VAR confirmed the decision despite unclear replays suggesting no deliberate arm contact. The Match Centre stated: "The no-goal ruling was reviewed and reaffirmed by VAR, which concluded that Jesus had inadvertently handled the ball prior to scoring."[1]
The plot thickened late in the game with Liverpool's Alexis Mac Allister at the center of two more VAR checks during the Reds' winning moments against Forest.[2] Both managers vented frustration over the officiating—Forest coach Ian Woan even picked up a booking. Pundits debated the Murillo goal's validity, noting VAR's view that Ndoye didn't obstruct, while Jesus' handball call remained divisive.[1]
The intense encounter highlighted ongoing Premier League VAR debates, with Liverpool fans particularly irked by inconsistent rulings. As the second half promised more fireworks, referees faced mounting pressure.[1]
(Word count: 298)
