Below is a summary of the full article. Click here for the full version from Mirror or go back to LFC Live.
Premier League Releases New Angle as VAR Forced to Intervene in Fulham vs Liverpool
In a dramatic Premier League clash at Craven Cottage, VAR intervention controversially disallowed a potential opener for Fulham against Liverpool, sparking heated debate among fans and pundits.[1]
The incident unfolded in the 21st minute when Fulham's Joshua King fired home what appeared to be the game's first goal. Initially awarded by referee Robert Jones, the strike was chalked off following a VAR review. The decision hinged on Rodrigo Muniz's challenge on Liverpool defender in the build-up, deemed a "careless" foul after Jones checked the pitchside monitor.[1][2]
The Premier League Match Centre issued an official statement: "Following the VAR review, the referee has overturned the initial decision granting a goal to Fulham. The referee stated: 'After reviewing, it was determined that Fulham's number nine committed a careless challenge, stepping on the defender's foot. Thus, we disallow the goal and will resume with a free kick.' No further action was taken."[1]
Fulham manager Marco Silva erupted in fury post-match, labeling the call "unbelievable" after his side fell to a 2-0 defeat. Chelsea's late goals from Joao Pedro and a contentious Enzo Fernandez penalty compounded the Cottagers' woes, with questions over handball involvement.[1][3]
In a stunning twist, VAR official Michael Salisbury—who oversaw the Fulham-Chelsea game (noted in related coverage)—was stood down from Liverpool's subsequent fixture against Arsenal. PGMOL chief Howard Webb admitted the intervention failed to meet the "high bar" for clear and obvious errors, breaching the 'referee's call' principle. John Brooks replaced him at Anfield.[2][3]
This saga underscores ongoing VAR scrutiny in the Premier League, with Fulham demanding answers and fans questioning consistency. Liverpool progressed unscathed, but the new angle released by the league has only fueled calls for reform.[4]
(Word count: 298)
