Below is a summary of the full article. Click here for the full version from Football Insider or go back to LFC Live.
West Ham Backed to Agree Cut-Price Jorgen Strand Larsen Deal
Former Manchester City financial adviser Stefan Borson has backed West Ham United to secure a cut-price deal for striker Jorgen Strand Larsen in the January transfer window, despite Wolves' previously high asking price.
In an exclusive interview with Football Insider, Borson highlighted West Ham's limited spending power amid ongoing takeover speculation. He noted that without a takeover, funds for major signings remain constrained due to the competitive transfer market. "Loads of teams want to do better... It’s an extremely competitive market," Borson explained, emphasizing the challenges for clubs like West Ham.[1]
West Ham fans have voiced frustration, protesting against owners David Sullivan and Karren Brady before a recent defeat to Crystal Palace, demanding more investment in the squad. However, Borson dismissed imminent takeover prospects, stating, "I don’t see that that’s going to change dramatically unless the club was sold."[1]
Turning to potential targets, Borson specifically endorsed Strand Larsen as a realistic option. The Norwegian forward, currently on loan at Wolves from Brighton with a prior £30m valuation, could be available at a reduced fee. "Well, I think West Ham could see that as a signing," Borson insisted, pointing to it as a smart, budget-friendly move to bolster the attack amid the Hammers' mid-table struggles.[2]
Borson believes West Ham's squad is solid enough to avoid relegation, but targeted additions like Strand Larsen—known for his goal-scoring prowess in the Premier League—could elevate their second-half performance. This comes as West Ham prepare for upcoming fixtures, including a home clash against Newcastle United.
The club faces pressure to act decisively in January, balancing financial prudence with fan expectations for ambition. Borson's verdict suggests a pragmatic path forward, focusing on value deals rather than blockbuster spending.[1][2]
(Word count: 298)
