Virgil van Dijk and Arsenal fans simultaneously left furious at same Liverpool incident

Below is a summary of the full article. Click here for the full version from Liverpool.com or go back to LFC Live.

Virgil van Dijk and Arsenal supporters were left equally incensed by a single flashpoint in Liverpool’s clash with Arsenal, when play continued despite a serious-looking injury to Jeremie Frimpong. As Frimpong went down in the Arsenal box after contact with Piero Hincapié, Liverpool’s players appealed for a penalty and then for play to be stopped so their teammate could receive treatment. Arsenal instead played on, launching a counterattack while Frimpong remained on the ground, sparking fury among Liverpool’s players and disbelief in the stands.

The incident culminated in a heated confrontation between Liverpool captain Van Dijk and Arsenal midfielder Declan Rice once the move broke down. The pair squared up and exchanged words before being separated by teammates and referee Anthony Taylor, encapsulating the anger on both sides over how the situation had been handled. Many Liverpool fans felt Arsenal had shown a lack of sportsmanship by not putting the ball out, while Arsenal supporters were equally frustrated that their team’s attacking momentum was halted for what replays suggested was relatively minimal contact on Frimpong.

Frimpong’s injury looked serious in real time, with slow-motion replays showing a painful ankle roll that seemed likely to force him off. Instead, after extended treatment, he was eventually able to continue, which only added to the debate about whether Arsenal were right to keep playing and whether the referee should have intervened earlier. VAR did not deem the initial contact worthy of a penalty review, further inflaming Liverpool frustrations.

The controversy became a focal point of the match’s narrative, feeding long‑running arguments about unwritten sportsmanship conventions versus playing to the whistle. For Van Dijk and Liverpool supporters, it symbolized a sense of injustice; for many Arsenal fans, it highlighted inconsistency in how such incidents are perceived depending on which side has the ball and the jeopardy of the moment.