Why Arne Slot’s fixation on PSG is stalling Liverpool’s progress

Below is a summary of the full article. Click here for the full version from This is Anfield or go back to LFC Live.

Why Arne Slot’s PSG fixation is stalling Liverpool’s progress

Arne Slot’s repeated references to Paris Saint-Germain have become a defining – and increasingly damaging – theme of Liverpool’s season. The head coach frequently talks about PSG’s attacking flair and wide-play as a model, but his attempt to bend Liverpool towards that template is exposing tactical and structural flaws in his own team.

Slot’s obsession with 4-3-3 and “real wingers” – framed against the backdrop of PSG’s star-studded forward lines – has led to a more rigid approach than the fluid, multi-layered football Liverpool produced under Jurgen Klopp.[1][3] The insistence on width and one‑v‑one dribblers has at times stripped Liverpool of their old strengths: counter-pressing cohesion, compactness between the lines, and the ability to control games through intensity rather than mere possession.

The article argues that this PSG fixation is also skewing recruitment and selection. Liverpool’s links to high-profile wide players and the constant talk of replicating PSG’s style risk creating a team built around an idealised version of modern attacking football rather than the realities of the current squad’s profile and the Premier League’s demands.[2][3] Established players are being asked to play roles that do not fully suit their attributes, leading to disjointed attacking patterns and a drop in output compared to previous seasons.[6][3]

There is also a psychological dimension: by continually elevating PSG as a reference point, Slot inadvertently frames Liverpool as imitators rather than innovators. This jars with the club’s identity and supporters’ expectations, and comes at a time when results and attacking numbers are already under scrutiny.[6][3]

The piece concludes that until Slot loosens his fixation on PSG and adapts his ideas more pragmatically to Liverpool’s unique strengths, the team’s evolution will remain stalled – not because his philosophy is inherently flawed, but because it is being applied as imitation rather than adaptation.[3]