Why Liverpool’s Transfer Plan Must Change After Marc Guehi Decision

Liverpool's long-standing pursuit of Crystal Palace defender Marc Guehi has ended in disappointment, forcing a rethink of their defensive transfer strategy amid mounting injury concerns and expiring contracts. The Reds came agonizingly close to securing the England international last summer, with a £35m deal reportedly agreed and Guehi accepting terms. However, Palace pulled out at the eleventh hour, prioritizing squad stability by retaining their captain without a replacement.[2]

Fast-forward to January 2026, and Manchester City have hijacked the move with an "insane" offer: £20m upfront plus add-ons potentially reaching £30m—a bargain given Guehi's contract expires in June. Reports confirm a deal is imminent, leaving Liverpool outmaneuvered and without their top defensive target.[2] This development exacerbates Liverpool's backline crisis, with long-term absentees like Conor Bradley and others sidelining options, piling pressure on Virgil van Dijk, Joe Gomez, and Jeremy Frimpong.[3]

Experts argue Liverpool's transfer plan must evolve urgently. ESPN analysts note the club "made a mess" of the initial Guehi bid but urge a renewed push—perhaps a loan or alternative starter-caliber center-back—given the lack of value in big January spends.[1] Van Dijk, now heavily relied upon, faces a contract decision by 2027 as he nears his mid-30s, alongside looming expirations for Alisson, Salah, Endo, Jones, Gomez, and Bajcetic.[1][3]

Manager Arne Slot, meanwhile, has reconciled with Mohamed Salah post-AFCON and contract rumors, expecting his return for Champions League action. Yet, with no Guehi contingency apparent, Liverpool risks defensive vulnerability.[1][4] Pundits recommend targeting extensions for Alisson and Jones while scouting backups; failing that, a pragmatic loan could bridge the gap until summer.[1]

In summary, Guehi's City switch underscores the need for Liverpool to adapt: prioritize depth now via loans or alternatives, secure key contracts, and avoid over-reliance on aging stars. Without change, title aspirations could falter.[1][2]

(Word count: 298)